Cleveland-Cliffs Q2-Q4 Price Realization Lags and Trends Analysis 2026

Quarterly realized price-per-ton bridge (Q2–Q4) and the ~2-month realization lag

What management explicitly says about the “2-month lag”

Cleveland-Cliffs stated that what used to be about a 1-month realization lag has extended to closer to 2 months, meaning pricing strength visible today will show up more fully in Q2 and Q3 results. ¹²³

They also quantified the direction and magnitude of price movements into Q2: “Selling prices are expected to be up about $60 a ton from Q1 to Q2.” ⁴ In the Q1 results discussion they further noted that average selling prices increased $55 per ton sequentially during the quarter (Q1 vs Q4) and that average selling prices increased $68 per ton vs a year ago. ²

---

Bridge framework (how to construct “realized price per ton” by quarter)

The excerpts do not provide a full Q2 realized $/ton, Q3 realized $/ton, and Q4 realized $/ton series in the way you’d see in a formal reconciliation table. Instead, they provide:

1. The realization-lag mechanics (~2 months). ²³
2. Expected Q2 selling price change vs Q1 (+~$60/ton). ⁴
3. The fact that Q3 should be “much better” than Q2. ⁴⁵

So, the only defensible “bridge” from the provided text is a timing-and-magnitude bridge based on disclosed quarter-to-quarter deltas, consistent with the 2-month lag.

---

Realized price-per-ton bridge (timing + magnitude of the 2-month lag)

Key assumptions required (because the excerpts don’t give Q3/Q4 realized deltas)

• We can build Q2 realized price as:
  Realized Q2 price ≈ Realized Q1 price + $60/ton (management guidance). ⁴
• We can describe Q3 and Q4 realized pricing direction as improving with the lag, but the excerpt does not give the numeric $/ton change for Q3 and Q4. ⁴⁵
• Therefore, below is a bridge that shows (a) the timing of what quarter’s market price feeds into realized results and (b) the only numeric magnitude explicitly given for Q2.

---

A) Timing bridge: how the 2-month lag moves market pricing into realized results

Because the realization lag is closer to 2 months, realized pricing in a given quarter primarily reflects market pricing from roughly two months earlier. ²³

A practical quarter mapping (illustrative, consistent with “closer to 2 months”):

• Q2 realized prices reflect market pricing strength largely from late Q1 / early Q2, since Q2 is when the “pricing strength visible today will increasingly show up… quarter by quarter.” ²³
• Q3 realized prices reflect additional pricing strength that was visible in Q1/Q2, with management explicitly stating Q2 and Q3 will capture the lagged pricing benefit. ²³
• Management also implies the full shipment/cost and earnings power won’t be fully on display until Q3, reinforcing that realized outcomes are still catching up due to operational and contractual timing. ⁵

Magnitude disclosure tied to this timing:

• The explicit quantified magnitude is Q2 expected selling prices up about $60/ton vs Q1. ⁴
• For Q1 itself, they reported sequential average selling price up $55/ton during the quarter (Q1 vs Q4) and $68/ton vs a year ago. ²

---

B) Magnitude bridge using the only numeric delta provided for Q2

Q2 realized price bridge (numerical)

• Q1 → Q2 realized selling price bridge: +~$60 per ton (expected). ⁴

This is directly management-guided for selling prices (a proxy for realized pricing in the earnings commentary). ⁴

Q3 and Q4 realized price bridge (directional only, no $/ton numbers in excerpts)

• Management guided that Q3 should be much better than Q2 as the lagged pricing benefits flow through with improved cadence/conditions. ⁴⁵
• However, the excerpts provided do not specify a Q3 or Q4 $/ton realized price delta, so a numeric Q2–Q4 realized price-per-ton bridge cannot be completed precisely from the text.

---

Compact bridge summary table (what can be supported strictly from the excerpts)

---

Additional evidence of magnitude consistency (what we know about realized price movement already happened)

• In Q1 results, management reported average selling prices increased $55 per ton sequentially during Q1 and $68 per ton vs a year ago. ²
• They also said contractual lags were longer than anticipated, and realized lag effectively extended to closer to 2 months, so price strength visible today would show more in Q2 and Q3. ²

This aligns with the +~$60/ton expected direction into Q2. ⁴

---

Bottom line (answering the “Q2–Q4 bridge showing timing and magnitude of the 2-month lag”)

• Timing: Management explicitly states realized pricing now reflects an approximately 2-month realization lag, extending from the prior ~1-month lag, with pricing strength visible today showing up more fully as the year progresses, particularly in Q2 and Q3. ²³
• Magnitude (quantified): The excerpts provide a numeric bridge only for Q2: selling prices expected to be up about $60/ton from Q1 to Q2. ⁴
• Magnitude for Q3 and Q4: The excerpts are directional only (“Q3 should be much better than Q2”) and do not provide $/ton realized price deltas for Q3 or Q4, so a complete numeric Q2–Q4 realized price-per-ton bridge cannot be constructed solely from the provided text. ⁴⁵

---