Cleveland-Cliffs Price-Lag Analysis Q2–Q4 2026 Earnings Transcript

Quarterly realized price-per-ton bridge (Q2–Q4) and the “~2-month lag” timing/magnitude

What Cliffs disclosed about the realized-price lag (the key bridge input)

Management stated that the pricing realization lag “used to be roughly a 1-month realization lag” but has “effectively extend[ed] to closer to 2 months.” ¹
They also explained that this means “pricing strength visible today will show up more fully in our results as we move through the year, quarter by quarter.” ¹

So, the “bridge” you’re asking for can be constructed only in the form of a timing bridge (what price you should expect to be reflected in each quarter) using the lag estimate, and a magnitude bridge where management explicitly gave sequential realized price changes that already embed the lag.

---

Magnitude evidence: sequential realized selling-price change from Q1 to Q2

For Q1, management provided the realized-price movement and the reason for slower realization:

• Average selling prices increased by $55 per ton sequentially during Q1 (Q1 vs Q4), reflecting improving market conditions. ²
• They further stated that “contractual lags were longer than anticipated” and that the realization lag extended toward “closer to 2 months,” meaning pricing strength visible in the period shows up more fully in later results (Q2 and Q3). ²
• For the explicit Q2 magnitude, they guided that “Selling prices are expected to be up about $60 a ton from Q1 to Q2.” ³

Taken together, the cleanest realized magnitude bridge management disclosed is therefore:

• Q2 realized selling price vs Q1: +$60/ton. ³

No explicit “realized price per ton in Q3” and “realized price per ton in Q4” values were provided in the excerpts. ³²¹

---

Timing bridge (2-month lag): how today’s pricing flows into Q2–Q4

Because management quantified the lag as ~2 months, the practical timing is:

• Q2 realized prices primarily reflect a mix of pricing from roughly late Q1 through early/mid Q2 (rather than just Q2 pricing alone). ¹
• Q3 realized prices reflect pricing strength from roughly mid Q2 through mid/late Q3, i.e., “more fully” showing up one quarter later than a ~1-month lag would. ¹
• Q4 realized prices reflect a further continuation of that delayed pass-through. ¹

This is the “timing” part of your bridge: it’s consistent across quarters because the lag regime is the same throughout the year according to management. ¹

---

Realized price bridge (Q2–Q4): what can be stated from the excerpts

A) Quantity of bridge you can quantify with excerpt-backed magnitudes

The only excerpt-backed realized sequential price magnitude given across the Q2 boundary is Q2 vs Q1 (+$60/ton). ³
The excerpts do not provide a management number for:

• Q3 vs Q2 realized price change (in $/ton), or
• Q4 vs Q3 realized price change (in $/ton). ³²

Therefore, any attempt to produce a numeric $/ton bridge for Q3 and Q4 would be speculative beyond what’s in the filings excerpt. ³²

B) However, the lag magnitude is explicitly described

The excerpt gives the lag magnitude as a change in realization timing:

• From ~1-month to “closer to 2 months.” ²¹

That implies a roughly one additional month of delay in how quickly customer/orders/contractual pricing flows into realized selling price. ¹

---

Bridge table (timing + available realized magnitude)

---

What the “2-month lag” implies for Q2–Q4 (timing and magnitude interpretation)

1) Timing: why Q2 and Q3 benefit from pricing visible earlier

Management explicitly tied the longer lag to the quarter-by-quarter appearance of market strength: pricing strength visible today “will increasingly show up” as results move through the year, quarter by quarter. ¹
They also stated this lag extension meant results in later quarters would show more of the strength: “That means price strength visible today will show up more fully in Q2 and Q3 results.” ²

2) Magnitude: you can quantify the lag as “+1 month” of timing delay (not $/ton)

The excerpt’s only direct magnitude is the change in realization period:

• ~1-month → closer to 2 months. ²¹

So the “magnitude of the 2-month lag” you can support from the excerpts is the incremental delay (~one additional month versus the old regime), not a dollar impact. ¹

---

Bottom line

• Quantified realized-price bridge (Q2 only): Management guided Q2 selling prices expected to be up ~+$60/ton from Q1. ³
• Timing bridge (Q2–Q4): Realization has moved to ~2 months, meaning pricing strength visible earlier is deferred and shows more fully in Q2 and Q3 rather than flowing through quickly. ²¹
• Q3 and Q4 numeric realized-price bridges ($/ton) are not provided in the excerpts, so they cannot be responsibly filled with numbers without introducing unsupported assumptions. ³²