Avery Dennison Q1 2026: Demand, Backlog, and Resilience Insights

Avery Dennison (AVY) Q1 2026: What demand and backlog signals suggest about resilience amid inflation

1) “Demand” signals: customer buying behavior looks cautious, but not collapsing

• Inflation is running hotter than planned and economic indicators are lower, which the company describes as a tougher demand backdrop to model. ¹
• In Materials label materials, management noted customer “prebuying” in regions with stronger inflation (especially Europe and parts of Asia, and some in North America), with some of that prebuying persisting into April. ²
• Management explicitly characterizes the volume pattern as temporary and managed: they expect the prebuy volume to largely unwind during the second half of Q2, rather than indicating a durable demand downturn. ²
• For end-market demand, they point to consumer-related caution (retailers/brands weighing consumer confidence, with CPG volumes muted for a couple of years) but add a near-term demand improvement signal: “a couple of CPGs” indicated volume growth at the start of the year. ¹

Implication for resilience: The demand-related “signal” in Q1 is mixed—customers appear cautious enough to pull forward orders (prebuying), but management expects that to unwind without breaking the underlying growth engine. ²¹

---

2) “Backlog” / order visibility signals: resilience shows up more as execution and timing than as a reported backlog number

The excerpts provided do not give a specific backlog figure (e.g., “backlog up/down X%” or “days of backlog”), so the backlog inference has to come from management’s discussion of order timing, ramp cadence, and category return-to-growth expectations.

Key visibility/timing signals:

• Materials Group: While certain high value categories were down in Q1 (e.g., Graphics and Reflectives down mid single digits; Performance Materials down low single digits, tied to customer order timing and softer auto end markets), management expects these categories to return to growth as the year progresses. ²
• They describe idiosyncratic Q1 headwinds in specific areas (e.g., strong prior-year comps and intra-quarter inventory dynamics with distributors, plus end-market sales softness in Graphics) and again expect a return to growth and overall volume increase as the year moves on. ³
• Solutions Group / Intelligent Labels (IL): The company highlights a “tale of two dynamics” because IL itself was down low single digits, but other high-value categories grew low single digits to mid single digits depending on product line. ⁴
• Despite the IL headwind in Q1, management stresses that the bigger IL ramp is weighted to the second half:
  • They say they feel good about rolling out new programs and seeing an expansion in growth rate as we go through the year. ⁵
  • They frame food and apparel programs as second-half weighted, particularly Walmart ramp in 2H 2026 and other apparel programs coming in later in the year. ⁵
  • They add that IL ramp is significant enough that they are planning for the 2025 outsized volume/share gains to be lapped if conditions normalize, while offsetting with additional pilots and emphasizing the food program ramp with Walmart in 2H. ⁶

Implication for resilience: Even without a numeric backlog disclosure in the excerpts, management’s repeated emphasis on program ramps, easing/lapping dynamics, and return-to-growth expectations functions as an “order visibility” signal that they believe demand has not structurally broken—rather, it’s being expressed through timing (prebuy/unwind and second-half scaling). ⁵⁶²

---

3) Inflation resilience signals: pricing/procurement and margin protection backed by Q1 performance

Even though the question focuses on demand/backlog, the real test of “resilience during inflation” is whether performance holds despite inflationary pressure.

• Management says inflation is higher than planned and the impact/timing/consequence is difficult to estimate, prompting them to expand scenario plans for multiple volume outcomes. ¹
• They cite a defensive framework: price increases, material reengineering, and proactive cost actions to stay ahead of inflationary pressures. ⁷
• Profit resilience in Q1 appears to come from offsetting mechanisms:
  • Materials Group delivered reported sales growth of 11% and organic sales growth ~2%, driven by mid-single-digit volume and mix that was partially offset by deflation-related price reductions. ²
  • Management highlights that adjusted EBITDA was up low double digits with margin up 10 basis points for the quarter. ²
  • Q1 adjusted EPS grew 7% year over year, and management explicitly calls this a demonstration of resilience in a tough environment where Materials Group stronger results offset Solutions Group softness. ⁷
  • They also state they have a history of successfully managing through inflation cycles, giving confidence in protecting profits, and point to security of supply as a competitive advantage even if supply chains tighten. ⁷

Implication for resilience: Inflation is acknowledged as real and moving, but Q1 outcomes plus management’s stated inflation-response playbook support the conclusion that the company is not losing the ability to earn through inflation—even while some demand signals show cautious customer behavior and quarter-to-quarter timing effects. ¹⁷²

---

Bottom line

In Q1 2026, Avery Dennison’s demand and (indirect) backlog/visibility signals indicate resilience rather than deterioration during inflation:

• Customers in inflation-pressured regions pulled demand forward (prebuying), and management expects this to unwind in the latter part of Q2, suggesting the issue is timing/cycle behavior more than a permanent demand collapse. ²
• Underlying end-market momentum shows early improvement signals in CPG volume growth despite broader caution. ¹
• For the company’s key growth engine (Intelligent Labels and other programs), management consistently frames major program ramp as second-half weighted, implying order/program visibility that should support growth through the year even if Q1 is softer in places. ⁵⁶
• Q1 results (e.g., Materials Group growth, adjusted EPS +7%, and margin/EBITDA improvement in Materials) align with management’s claim of resilience and their inflation-mitigation strategy (pricing, reengineering, scenario planning). ⁷²

If you want a single-sentence synthesis: Q1 shows inflation-driven customer caution expressed via prebuying and timing shifts, but management’s second-half program ramp visibility and strong Q1 earnings/EPS execution suggest resilience rather than structural demand weakness. ²⁵⁷