GlobalFoundries' Strategic Focus on AI Spending and Partnerships for 2026

How demand trends and backlog signals are shaping biofuels growth prospects into 2026

Based on Corteva’s management commentary, the growth outlook for biofuels around 2026 is being supported less by “backlog” in the classic contract-book sense and more by visible policy/mandate momentum, energy-price sensitivity, and feedstock-demand signals (i.e., where additional biofuel blending/production would require more crop demand). This combination is creating a constructive demand backdrop for traditional fuels (e.g., ethanol) and next-gen fuels (e.g., sustainable aviation fuel) heading into 2026. ¹

---

1) Demand trend: management expects another record global biofuels demand year in 2026

Management explicitly framed the demand environment as strengthening globally, stating that this year (2026) is expected to be another record demand year for biofuels globally, after last year was also a record. ¹ The same remarks connect incremental demand to the level of energy prices, arguing that demand could rise further if energy prices stay elevated globally. ¹

Implication for growth prospects: If 2026 remains a “record” demand year, the crop and agronomic ecosystems that supply biofuel feedstocks have a clearer runway into late 2026 and beyond, because fuel demand is not portrayed as fading—rather, it’s portrayed as strengthening. ¹

---

2) Policy and mandate “signal”: ethanol blending setpoints imply higher feedstock demand

Corteva’s biofuels framing emphasizes several geographic mandate/roadmap catalysts:

• Brazil: Brazil is moving to E32, expected to increase consumption of domestic corn, which management describes as “structurally great” for farming in Brazil and supportive of energy-cost dynamics. ¹
• Southeast Asia (next-gen aviation fuel): Southeast Asia has lofty goals to lead in next-generation aviation fuel; management argues that if those goals are hit, it “will drive a lot of crop demand.” ¹
• U.S.: management says the U.S. is close to an E15 year-round mandate, still needing execution, but that it “certainly would help farming.” ¹
  • They estimate E15 could consume up to another 15% of the U.S. corn crop, which management views as favorable for U.S. farmers. ¹

Implication for growth prospects: These are “demand signals” that resemble backlog—policy targets and mandate pathways create expected future volumes even before feedstock procurement shows up as fully recognized revenue. Management’s posture is that these catalysts support continued growth rather than a pause into 2026. ¹

---

3) Next-gen fuel conversion is moving from concept to acreage-scale execution (a practical demand confirmation)

In the near term, management linked demand to acreage conversion toward sustainable aviation fuel (SAF) systems and reported on-the-ground farmer adoption:

• Near term, in the South of the U.S., they are preparing to harvest roughly 100,000 acres planted for sustainable aviation fuel, with partners including Bunge and Chevron. ¹
• The crop “looks good agronomically,” yields are described as favorable, and farmers are expected to be profitable. ¹
• Importantly for “backlog-like” signal quality, management reported farmer retention in the new cropping system over 90%—stating that if a farmer tries the system once, they incorporate it into their program. ¹

Implication for growth prospects: This provides a tangible feedstock-demand signal that the market is not merely discussing next-gen biofuels but is translating them into repeatable acreage commitments—an indicator that 2026 demand could be underpinned by real production planning. ¹

---

4) Expansion plans reinforce expected demand durability into 2026–2027

Management also discussed scaling biofuels-related crop programs:

• They stated expansion to north of 400,000 acres next year and described this as “material growth” over the last three years as the concept has been proven. ²

Implication for growth prospects: Even though this is not a “backlog order book” disclosure, the ability/willingness to expand acreage implies confidence that the demand signals (policy + energy economics + next-gen pathways) will persist at least across the 2026 cycle and into the next planning window. ²

---

5) Demand sensitivity to energy prices: elevated energy is treated as the key swing factor for incremental growth

Management’s demand thesis is explicitly energy-price dependent. They expect more demand if energy prices remain elevated globally. ¹ In parallel, their broader ag/input commentary reinforces that higher energy/oil pricing can affect farming economics and planting decisions—but they still framed biofuels demand momentum as holding in 2026. ¹³

Implication for growth prospects: If energy prices stay supportive, the demand side (blending economics, competitiveness of biofuels) remains favorable; if energy prices fall sharply, the incremental demand upside could moderate. The excerpt, however, points to management expecting continuation rather than reversal. ¹

---

Bottom line for 2026 growth prospects

Corteva’s excerpts portray 2026 biofuels growth as being supported by three interlocking “signals”:

1. Macro demand trend: expected record global biofuels demand in 2026, building on a record prior year. ¹
2. Policy/roadmap catalysts: Brazil’s move to E32, U.S. progress toward E15 year-round, and Southeast Asia’s next-gen aviation fuel ambitions—all viewed as feedstock-demand drivers. ¹
3. Operational feedstock confirmation: acreage already allocated for SAF systems (about 100,000 acres) with >90% farmer retention, plus expansion to >400,000 acres next year. ¹²

Together, these reduce the probability that growth is purely aspirational; they suggest demand is translating into production planning—i.e., the “backlog” equivalent is embedded in mandates, energy economics, and repeatable acreage commitments leading into and through 2026. ¹²