Gallagher’s 2026 Market Outlook: Resilience Amid Moderating Property Pricing

Gallagher’s view of the 2026 market environment and property pricing resilience (Q1’26)

1) The “macro” backdrop Gallagher sees going into 2026: moderating property, rational underwriting elsewhere

Gallagher characterizes the early-2026 environment as one where property pricing is moderating while other major parts of the portfolio remain strong and diversify the risk of the cycle. ¹ Specifically, management notes that while property pricing is moderating, casualty, benefits, reinsurance, and Gallagher Bassett are “all strong,” and that this strength is broad-based across geographies, client sizes, and products. ¹

In the same framing, Gallagher links demand/activity to its proprietary monitoring and suggests business activity remains solid through the first quarter (and even “through yesterday” at the time of the call). ¹ That matters because it supports the idea that even with pricing reset in property, the underlying client exposure remains engaged, helping resilience across the company’s diversified book. ¹

2) Property pricing: declines are happening, but Gallagher treats them as “moderating,” not collapsing

Gallagher is explicit that property pricing is moderating. ¹ It also provides more operational context for how property weakness is expected to play out during the year:

• Management says property “will take its biggest hole in the second quarter”, implying the most meaningful pressure is expected after Q1 and then less “property stress” for the rest of the year. ²
• It further says that in the second half of the year, it has “a pretty good view on property” and that for the rest of the year there is “not that much property stress.” ²

They also indicate their outlook is anchored to observed early-quarter conditions and renewals: management discusses a “property price declines relative to what you saw in the Q1” framing (i.e., their assumptions are tied to the degree of property decline they’ve seen so far). ³

3) Retail P/C renewal pricing mix: property down materially, but non-property partially offsets

Gallagher quantifies the retail P/C renewal environment in Q1’26 as “materially unchanged” from the prior quarter, with a clear property/casualty split:

• Total insurance renewal premium change in Q1’26 increased in the low single digits, with property decreases more than offset by increases across most casualty classes. ⁴
• Property down 7% (with rate pressure most pronounced in cat-exposed and larger risks). ⁴
• Professional lines up 2%, workers’ comp up 2%, personal lines up 4%, package up 2%, and casualty lines up 4% overall. ⁴
• Excluding property, renewal premium changes increased 4% in the quarter. ⁴

This mix is directly relevant to “pricing resilience” because it shows Gallagher does not view the market as purely “falling”—rather, property is the weak leg, while casualty and other lines support consolidated resilience. ⁴

4) Market structure within E&S: competitive pressure is concentrated in certain property segments, not across the board

Gallagher describes a bifurcated E&S (excess & surplus) market and interprets the competition mostly as a pricing reset rather than demand destruction:

• For U.S. E&S, it states submarkets behave differently after a strong hard market. ⁴
• It calls E&S property (especially cat-exposed risks) the “most competitive area” right now, and says this reflects a pricing reset, not a demand issue. ⁴
• It reports policy counts and submissions remain healthy, and that E&S is the right solution for complex property risks. ⁴
• It also says E&S casualty remains firm, with renewal premiums up mid-single digits and disciplined capacity, alongside steady demand in general/excess liability and umbrella. ⁴

So Gallagher’s resilience thesis is partly structural: where pricing is softest (E&S cat-exposed property), demand indicators remain healthy, while other E&S lines maintain firmness. ⁴

5) Their “durability” stance for 2026 is explicitly tied to portfolio strength plus execution (retention and new business)

Gallagher’s management links its market view to measurable client outcomes:

• Organic growth prospects: it notes retention is stable and excellent new business wins are contributing positively to organic growth. ¹
• It states “pricing—property pricing is moderating,” but emphasizes that the rest of the portfolio and client exposure growth are supporting durability. ¹
• Based on these factors, Gallagher expresses confidence in the durability of results and cites confidence in the 2026 full-year organic growth outlook of 6%. ¹

Separately, Gallagher explains why renewal/hit rates may hold up even if the pricing cycle is softer:

• It says digitizing the client relationship has increased retention by about one full point (from about 94.5% to 95.5%), which it characterizes as close to renewing essentially all eligible policies. ⁵
• It also ties tools to win rates, citing an improvement in hit ratio from about 32% historically to approaching 45% when using those tools. ⁵
• This is presented as an advantage for securing new business in competitive contexts. ⁵

While these points are not solely “property pricing resilience,” they are directly relevant to why Gallagher believes performance can remain resilient despite weaker property price dynamics. ⁵

6) How Gallagher treats competition and rates: “low level” and near 2017 pricing suggests less room for further structural deterioration

Gallagher also signals that the pricing environment itself may not have a lot of downside left in a structural sense:

• It says rates are approaching a “pretty low level”, and in some instances rates are approaching 2017 pricing. ⁶
• It concludes that it doesn’t think there’s a structural big-time jump further beyond that. ⁶

This matters for “property pricing resilience” because it implies the market is already resetting to a level they consider near a historical anchor, reducing the likelihood of a prolonged new leg down driven purely by rate levels. ⁶

7) Specialty market exceptions: war-related coverages can reprice and capacity can be selective, but Gallagher sees “coverage availability” as not equivalent to easy deployment

Gallagher distinguishes normal market softening from a clear exception:

• It states that war-related risks remain the clear exception, with marine/aviation/political violence exposures tied to active conflict zones seeing significant repricing and more selective deployment of capacity. ⁷
• It adds that war cover remains available, but requires careful structure and coordinated execution across markets. ⁸

So for 2026, Gallagher expects property pricing moderation broadly, but with identifiable pockets—particularly conflict-related niches—where pricing and capacity behavior can diverge from general trends. ⁷⁸

---

Bottom line (Gallagher’s 2026 framing)

• Gallagher’s overall view: 2026’s market is characterized by moderating property pricing, but company-wide resilience is supported by strength in casualty, benefits, reinsurance, and Gallagher Bassett, along with stable retention and strong new business wins. ¹
• Property resilience specifics: property is expected to face its biggest pressure in Q2, after which management expects less property stress for the rest of the year. ² In early 2026 data, property renewals are down 7% in Q1, but non-property increases help offset that at the consolidated renewal premium level. ⁴
• Pricing outlook tone: Gallagher suggests rates are already near low levels (approaching 2017 pricing) and does not see a structural large further jump beyond that. ⁶
• Important exception: war-related exposures can still see significant repricing and selective capacity, meaning resilience is not uniform across all property-related niches. ⁷⁸