Copart’s Shift to Pure Sale Auctions in US Insurance Market Q3 2026

What’s driving Copart’s shift toward higher pure sale mix in U.S. insurance auctions?

Management frames the shift primarily as insurance carriers reallocating auction management style because they see that buyer liquidity at Copart is effectively unavoidable and that reserving differently would chill participation.

1) Carriers have discretion, and they’ve “voted with their feet”

Copart says insurance carriers retain discretion over how they run/structure auctions, including whether they use “pure sale” versus more managed approaches. ¹ Copart contrasts today’s situation with “7 or 8 years ago,” noting that “many more insurance carriers have moved to effectively a nearly 100% pure sale approach” (and a “handful” moved the other way). ¹ Management adds an explicit point: “nobody has increased their portion of managed sale auctions at Copart.” ¹

2) Carriers observe liquidity in real time (so “escaping liquidity” isn’t feasible)

Copart explains that carriers understand participants and bidding intensity because auctions can be observed by carriers (including virtually), and they can literally see cross-regional/cross-country bidding. ¹ Management’s example highlights that, in practice, buyers from Poland, Oklahoma, Maine, Canada, and Ecuador can be bidding on the same transaction in real time. ¹ The implication management states directly is that carriers recognize there is “no real way to escape the liquidity at Copart.” ¹

3) Higher pure-sale participation is perceived to improve buyer behavior (more excitement → better outcomes)

Copart links the pure-sale mix to buyer psychology and participation incentives. ¹ It notes that pure sale items attract buyers and that “you tend to generate better outcomes and faster outcomes when buyers are excited to participate.” ¹ Management also argues carriers could impose high reserve prices, but sees that as counterproductive because it would “merely chill buyer participation.” ¹

4) The pure sale mix increase is reinforced by seller participation signals (not just claims about liquidity)

Management asserts that the best evidence of liquidity is seller behavior: “Whatever we or anyone else asserts about their auction liquidity, the best testimony for auction liquidity is your seller participation.” ² It then states: sellers “entrust[] ever more of their volume to us on a pure sale basis.” ²

5) Copart attributes improved returns to buyer recruitment and “crossover buyers”

Management also connects the environment that supports pure-sale outcomes to buyer network structure. ² It says their analysis shows international buyers, financed buyers, new buyers, and particularly “crossover buyers” are critical enablers of higher auction returns. ² It defines crossover buyers as those who enter Copart first via non-insurance vehicle discovery (e.g., rental car companies, financial institutions, dealers) and then bid on insurance vehicles. ² Copart adds a retention/transition metric: looking back over the past 3 years, a “strong majority” of buyers who first entered via non-insurance vehicles would bid on an insurance vehicle within the first 90 days. ²

6) U.S. insurance pure-sale mix is at all-time highs (directly stated)

Copart makes the outcome of the trend very concrete: for U.S. insurance sellers at Copart, the mix of pure sale units is at “all-time highs.” ² It also estimates pure sale insurance volume is “literally an order of magnitude higher” than what is available at other similar platforms. ²

---

What does management say this implies for buyer liquidity and seller outcomes?

Buyer liquidity implication: it’s deep, diversified, and resilient—so pure sale can sustain strong bidding

Copart explicitly argues that at Copart liquidity is broad enough that it can’t be neutralized by reserves/auction mechanics (because participation remains robust). ¹ It also emphasizes that outcomes are supported by a deep and diverse buyer network spanning more than 160 countries, arguing no single region/currency unduly influences auction outcomes. ³

Management further quantifies participation relevance at the U.S. auction level via buyer base mix:

• It states international buyers represent more than 1/3 of the volumes sold at U.S. Copart auctions and nearly half of auction proceeds. ³
• It frames demand resilience as coming from breadth and diversification of the buyer base rather than reliance on any single corridor. ³

Seller outcome implication: better “highest and best use” value, first time through the auction

Copart’s stated mechanism for seller outcomes is that a vehicle sold at Copart finds its “highest and best use worldwide,” and that pure sale supports faster/better buyer engagement. ¹ It also claims seller participation is increasing because sellers believe Copart’s buyer recruitment/product discovery/auction management practices will yield the “highest and best value the first time through our auction.” ²

In addition, Copart links the pure-sale-supported liquidity environment to auction return performance:

• It reports U.S. insurance ASPs increased 4.1% year-over-year and reached a seasonally adjusted all-time record high for Copart insurance ASPs in the third quarter. ³
• It says international buyers are a critical driver of these auction returns. ³

Practical seller implication: carriers’ move to pure sale is associated with better auction economics (not merely policy)

Management’s logic chain is: carriers can impose reserve structures, but they believe doing so would chill participation; therefore they increasingly choose pure-sale formats because the platform’s liquidity makes buyer engagement strong enough to support higher realized value and faster outcomes. ¹ Copart then points to U.S. pure-sale unit mix reaching all-time highs as evidence sellers accept (and leverage) this dynamic. ²

---

Bottom line (based on management’s statements)

• Driver: Copart says the shift is driven by insurance carrier discretion moving toward near-100% pure sale because carriers observe and can’t avoid Copart’s liquidity, and because they believe reserves would reduce buyer participation. ¹
• Liquidity implication: Pure sale relies on a very broad, diversified buyer network (with international and crossover buyers as key enablers), which management says is resilient and hard to neutralize via auction format changes. ²³¹
• Seller outcome implication: Management asserts that pure sale supports higher and faster “highest and best” outcomes—evidenced by increasing seller allocation to pure sale and by reported strong insurance ASP performance. ¹²³