Cal-Maine's Echo Lake Capacity Expansion Outlook Through Mid-2027

Echo Lake 17M‑lb scrambled capacity: monthly/quarterly phasing & utilization curve through mid‑fiscal 2027 (what can/can’t be derived from the filings)

What the filings explicitly say about capacity and ramp timing

1. Cal‑Maine says it has launched a network optimization and capacity expansion project at Echo Lake that is expected to add 17 million pounds of annual scrambled egg production by mid‑fiscal 2027. ¹
2. Management also states that, as these projects ramp, Echo Lake Foods has and will experience temporary lower volume and higher costs beginning late in 2026 and continuing through the remainder of the fiscal year. ²
3. In addition, the company references a previously announced $14.8 million high-speed pancake line expected to add another 12 million pounds of capacity through early fiscal 2027 (this appears to be part of the broader prepared foods/Echo Lake expansion program, though the excerpt does not state whether the 17M-lb number is inclusive or incremental to the 12M-lb line). ²

The key limitation: no “utilization curve” detail is provided

Your request is for a monthly/quarterly phasing and expected utilization curve for the 17M‑pound scrambled capacity through mid‑fiscal 2027. However, the provided excerpts do not include:

• starting/ending “percent utilization” by month/quarter,
• an explicit ramp schedule (e.g., “33% in QX, 67% in QY…”),
• definitions like whether “17M pounds annual” means at a steady state rate (100%) vs. a prorated first year run rate,
• or any month-by-month production/output volumes.

The only ramp-related numeric timing supplied is mid‑fiscal 2027 for reaching annualized additional capacity and late 2026 through year-end for lower volume/higher costs during ramp. ²¹

Because of that, I can provide (a) a high-confidence phasing framework anchored to management’s timing, but (b) I cannot honestly produce a precise utilization percentage curve by quarter/month from these excerpts alone.

---

A defensible phasing framework (anchored to management’s stated ramp windows)

Assumptions needed to draw a utilization curve (and why they’re not stated)

To translate “expected to add 17M pounds of annual production by mid‑fiscal 2027” into a quarterly/monthly utilization curve, one would need assumptions such as:

• whether the ramp is linear vs. stepwise,
• whether the plant reaches full steady-state output exactly at mid‑fiscal 2027 or shortly before/after,
• what “temporary lower volume” magnitude is (and whether it is a reduction vs. simply “not yet at full capacity”).

None of these are quantified in the provided excerpts. ²¹

Therefore, below is a non-numeric utilization curve (directional) consistent with management guidance.

---

Expected utilization curve (directional) for the 17M-lb incremental annual scrambled capacity

Through mid‑fiscal 2027, the program has two clear phases

Phase A — Ramp disruption / lower volume period (late 2026 through remainder of fiscal 2026)

• Cal‑Maine expects temporary lower volume and higher costs beginning late in 2026 and continuing through the remainder of the fiscal year. ²
  Utilization implication (directional): incremental capacity is not yet operating at full effective utilization; output is likely constrained by conversions/automation installation and workflow consolidation described as part of the program narrative. ²¹

Phase B — Ramp re-emergence into higher throughput (4Q FY2026 into 1H FY2027), culminating at mid‑fiscal 2027

• Management expects operational improvement as the changes come online: Q3 is expected to have a continued pullback, with improvement expected to begin in the fourth quarter and then build from there over the next twelve months or so. ³
• The network optimization/capacity expansion is expected to add 17M pounds of annual scrambled production by mid‑fiscal 2027. ¹

Utilization implication (directional): utilization should climb meaningfully starting in 4Q FY2026, accelerating into 1H FY2027, reaching near “100% of the incremental annualized 17M-lb run-rate” by mid‑fiscal 2027 (because that is the stated target). ¹³

---

Translating the above into a quarter-by-quarter table (still non-numeric)

Because the excerpts do not specify utilization percentages or month-by-month outputs, the most accurate “curve” is a qualitative trajectory:

This is a “utilization curve” in the sense of directional phasing, but it is not a numeric utilization curve.

---

What I can say numerically from the filings (but it doesn’t become a utilization curve)

• The incremental scrambled capacity target is +17 million pounds of annual scrambled egg production by mid‑fiscal 2027. ¹
• The company also describes other capacity actions (e.g., +12 million pounds through early fiscal 2027 from a $14.8M high-speed pancake line, and separate Trapini capacity investment). ²

Those numbers help confirm scale and target dates, but the excerpt set still does not provide production rates over time, so they cannot be converted into a monthly/quarterly utilization curve for the 17M-lb scrambled tranche specifically. ²¹

---

Bottom line

• A precise monthly/quarterly utilization curve (with percentages or pounds per month) cannot be produced from the provided excerpts, because they contain only directional ramp timing (lower volume late 2026 through the remainder of the fiscal year; improvement emerging in 4Q and building thereafter) and only a single endpoint target (17M-lb annual scrambled capacity by mid‑fiscal 2027). ²¹³
• A high-confidence phasing schedule is:
  • Late FY2026–3Q FY2026: below-full utilization with temporary lower volume/higher costs. ²³
  • 4Q FY2026: utilization begins to emerge. ³
  • 1H FY2027 → mid‑fiscal 2027: utilization ramps to reach the 17M-lb annualized scrambled production target. ¹³

If you have an additional excerpt that includes ramp pacing (e.g., “we expect to run at X% of the new line in Q3, Y% in Q4…” or a production/throughput table), I could convert that into a true numeric utilization curve by month/quarter through mid‑fiscal 2027.