Loading annual review details
Tapestry, Inc. (TPR)FY2026 investor yearly review
Across Q1–Q4, management framed Amplify as structural: Gen Z-led customer acquisition and core leather execution drove expanding profitability and a stronger cash engine. Coach showed compounding momentum and store-driven experiences, while Kate Spade’s turnaround stayed more gradual, managed through assortment focus, marketing reach, and selective retail upgrades.
Overall investor read
Strong execution, Kate reset uneven
Full-year results exceeded management’s Investor Day commitments early, but Kate Spade progress remained more gradual.
Primary financial signal
$8B revenue; 23.9% operating margin
Financially, the year combined top-line growth with margin expansion, supported by improving cash generation and discipline.
Primary call signal
Coach floors reiterated; Kate phased plan
In Q4, management reiterated mid-single-digit Coach expectations and a phased Kate Spade strategy into FY27.
FY2026 headline metrics capturing growth, profitability, and cash generation.
Revenue
Up 14.2% pro forma, reflecting Amplify-led customer acquisition.
Gross margin
Gross margin held strong despite tariff noise and reset investments.
Operating margin
Expanded to 23.9%, aligning with management’s margin commitments.
Net income
Net income surged versus prior year, indicating earnings power shift.
Diluted EPS
EPS grew 7.9% supported by operating leverage and cash discipline.
Free cash flow
Free cash flow rose 65.7%, reinforcing a reinvest-and-return model.
Free cash flow margin
Cash conversion stayed high as management scaled marketing and experiences.
Capital returns
Capital returned while management continued investing in brand and fleet.
Amplify became a full-year earnings engine: Coach’s Gen Z acquisition and core leather momentum drove margins and cash, while Kate Spade reset stayed phased.
Customer acquisition flywheel
Across Q1–Q4, management repeatedly linked growth to acquiring new (Gen Z-led) customers and improving retention, with Coach core leather execution producing both AUR and units. Q2 and Q3 framed acceleration into holiday and continued global momentum, while Q4 tied it to customer acquisition scale and mix discipline.
Quarter-by-quarter materiality and tone for annual transcript themes.
Scroll horizontally to see more columns.
| Theme | Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | Next monitor |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gen Z acquisition compounded into Coach-led AUR and unit strength | Positive Coach Gen Z recruiting lifted AUR and units, beat-and-raise momentum. |
Improvements in Coach-led acquisition, margin discipline, and demand creation compounded through the year, while Kate Spade’s reset stayed slower and more management-intensive than Coach.
Across Q1–Q4, management repeatedly framed outperformance as evidence the Amplify agenda is structural. They raised full-year outlook multiple times after early-quarter execution and holiday comp success.
Management pointed to diversified leather goods momentum (AUR and unit improvements) in each quarter, including tabby and new york franchise strength. Q4 reiterated disciplined promotions and mix that supported year-end results.
Q1 started with rising optimism from early Coach strength; Q2 reinforced holiday outperformance and raised the year; Q3 broadened global momentum and margins; Q4 closed the year with upgraded confidence and FY27 algorithm guidance.
Operational improvements sustained profitability and liquidity
Product breakdown bars are scaled against the largest annual revenue item; labels show revenue, YoY change, and revenue share.
Regional breakdown bars are scaled against the largest annual revenue item; labels show revenue, YoY change, and revenue share.
Q1 introduced Amplify’s structural thesis with Coach-led customer acquisition and early Kate KPI progress, Q2 validated compounding through holiday outperformance, Q3 broadened global momentum and margin confidence, and Q4 reframed FY26 success into FY27 algorithm guidance with Coach floors and a more clarified Kate plan.
Management described Q1 as a powerful start to Amplify, citing Gen Z-driven customer acquisition and Coach core leather strength. Kate Spade remained in reset mode with sequential improvement but ongoing discounting tradeoffs and tariff awareness.
Read earnings transcriptQ2 framed customer acquisition and core leather growth as durable across the holiday period, with expanding margins and raised full-year guidance. Management contrasted Coach momentum with Kate’s deliberate promotional pullback that pressured revenue despite KPI lift progress.
Management provided multiple directional and quantified FY2026 guidance updates; actuals ultimately reflected outperformance with recurring margin and cash strength themes.
FY2026 revenue expected around $7.3B (pro forma growth 7%–8% nominal; 6%–7% constant currency).; FY2026 gross margin guided to decline ~50 bps (with operational expansion and Stuart Weitzman tailwind).; FY2026 EPS expected $5.45 to $5.60.; FY2026 adjusted free cash flow expected $1.3B.
Revenue $8B; Gross margin 77.8%; EPS $7.27; Other $1.81B
Q1 guidance framed tariffs and margin puts-and-takes, but subsequent quarters showed sustained acquisition-led strength that left FY2026 clearly ahead.
FY2026 revenue over $7.75B (pro forma growth ~15% nominal; 14% constant currency).; FY2026 gross margin expected to increase ~20 bps and fully mitigate tariffs.; FY2026 EPS $6.40 to $6.45.; FY2026 adjusted free cash flow ~$1.5B.
Revenue $8B; Gross margin 77.8%; EPS $7.27; Other $1.81B
Q2 raised the earnings and cash frame, and actual FY2026 outcomes suggest continued execution of the margin mitigation and AUR-driven model.
Key forward monitoring areas based on repeated management emphasis across the year.
Management tied revenue durability to acquiring new (Gen Z-led) customers who return more frequently.
Track new customers and retention/engagement language for Gen Z cohorts in Q1 calls.
Coach’s reported AUR versus units balance supported gross margin strength and disciplined growth into FY27.
Watch for AUR rate and unit commentary alongside promo-day/timing explanations in Q1 guidance.
Margin drivers and mitigation
Management described gross margin as supported by AUR and supply-chain/operational improvements, with tariff timing creating quarter-to-quarter noise. In Q1 and Q2, they discussed operational expansion plus mitigating offsets; Q3 and Q4 emphasized continued gross margin strength as a core value creation model.
Demand creation and AI enablement
Across the year, management described increasing marketing investment alongside reduced promotional intensity, positioning spend as “brand-building” and customer acquisition fuel. Q2 and Q3 highlighted shifts toward top-of-funnel; Q4 added proprietary technology and an AI patent/data fabric narrative, reinforcing the decision-making moat.
Brand turnaround and assortment focus
Management consistently described Kate Spade as in a turnaround with improvements in consideration, Gen Z acquisition, and handbag blockbusters, but also noted topline trends remained pressured. Q2 and Q3 emphasized reducing promotions and strengthening omnichannel experiences; Q4 added clarity on marketing reach and creative leadership changes while describing more gradual top-line progress.
Holiday comp reinforced customer acquisition; leather growth stayed diversified.
Positive Coach accelerated again globally; core leather delivered AUR plus units. |
Positive Year capped by 11M new customers; Coach floor reaffirmed. |
| Track new customer additions, Gen Z influence, and AUR/unit commentary into Q1. |
| Gross margin strength leaned on AUR/AUC and operational discipline | Mixed Gross margin expansion offset tariff noise and supply-chain operational improvements. | Positive Operational gross margin expansion helped offset tariff impacts in Q2. | Positive Q3 gross margin exceeded plan; operational strength plus divestiture benefit. | Positive FY and Q4 gross margin expanded; management discussed lumpy phasing. | Watch AUR/AUC drivers versus tariff timing; listen for “operational vs tariff” framing. |
| Marketing shifted to top-of-funnel demand creation, backed by data/AI | Positive Marketing investment supported customer acquisition with disciplined expense leverage. | Positive Higher marketing and reduced promotional messaging supported acquisition during holiday. | Positive Top-of-funnel campaigns and partner activations drove Gen Z resonance. | Positive AI patent and data fabric reinforced demand creation and decision intelligence. | Monitor marketing intensity and unaided awareness discussion, alongside AI-enabled planning language. |
| Kate Spade reset progressed with phased, consumer-signal-led changes | Mixed Kate revenue improved sequentially; discounting discipline constrained top-line growth. | Mixed Promotional pullback drove revenue decline; KPI lifts suggested early turnaround. | Mixed Sequential improvement continued; plan hit via higher profitability but topline pressure. | Mixed Management cited greater clarity; focused marketing reach and creative leadership changes. | Watch purchase intent, full-price selling, handbag AUR, and marketing reach KPIs in Q1. |
Management described gross margin as supported by operational improvements and AUR, while tariffs created quarter-by-quarter noise. In Q4 they emphasized continued structural drivers and discussed lumpy phasing assumptions.
Free cash flow and operating cash flow improved through the year, supporting shareholder returns while still funding brand investments and store concepts. Management tied the model to flexibility and free-cash differentiation.
Management acknowledged the turnaround’s topline improvements were more gradual than planned and that further work was needed in brand awareness, assortment, and execution. Even with KPI lifts, revenue pressure persisted.
Across guidance discussions, management repeatedly highlighted tariff impacts that move through the P&L with noise and uneven quarterly phasing. In Q1–Q4 they managed assumptions via operational offsets and mitigation plans.
Management emphasized that unit outcomes were partly shaped by timing of promotion days and sell-through, while growth in Q4 was driven more by AUR with units in-line. This makes unit trajectory sensitive to execution.
Kate and Coach commentary repeatedly emphasized fewer, focused offerings and controlled innovation. Management also noted the need for continued creative execution and product distinctiveness as growth scales.
Scroll horizontally to see more columns.
| Quarter | Revenue | YoY revenue growth | Diluted EPS | Gross margin | Investor read |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1Sep-25 | $1.7B | -1.1% | $1.28 | 76.3% | Coach-led momentum raised full-year outlook, while Kate Spade remained in reset mode despite early green shoots. |
| Q2Dec-25 | $2.5B | 46.8% | $2.68 | 75.5% | Q2 outperformance came with higher acquisition and marketing investment, and Kate’s strategy drove KPI progress despite topline pressure. |
| Q3Mar-26 | $1.92B | -23.2% | $1.65 | 76.9% | Coach kept advancing with customer acquisition and differentiated product execution, while Kate’s sequential top-line trend stayed pressured. |
| Q4Jun-26 | $1.88B | -2.3% | $1.66 | 83.3% | Q4 reinforced the Coach algorithm into FY27 while Kate’s brand investment learnings guided a more phased next-step plan. |
In Q3, management emphasized broad-based international outperformance, operational margin expansion, and gross margin strength as a core value creation model. Kate’s topline trend improved sequentially but remained under expectations as marketing and assortment execution continued.
Read earnings transcriptQ4 translated the year’s results into management confidence: Investor Day commitments were achieved early, Coach’s growth floors were reiterated, and the One Coach strategy was described as driving higher AUR with disciplined units. Kate Spade moved from streamlining to solidifying with clearer learnings.
Read earnings transcriptFY2026 revenue expected around $7.95B (16% in constant currency; FX 80 bps tailwind).; FY2026 gross margin expected to increase ~110 bps versus prior outlook (operational expansion + AUR).; FY2026 EPS expected around $6.95.; FY2026 adjusted free cash flow to approach $1.6B.
Revenue $8B; Gross margin 77.8%; EPS $7.27; Other $1.81B
Q3’s upgraded guidance rested on AUR-driven operational expansion and mitigation pacing; FY2026 largely validated that approach.
No new FY2026 guidance in Q4; management entered FY2027 with FY2026 results behind them.; No new FY2026 guidance in Q4; focus shifted to FY2027 algorithm.; No new FY2026 cash guidance in Q4; management instead discussed FY2027 cash and CapEx step-up.
Revenue $8B; EPS $7.27; Other $1.81B
Q4 largely served as confirmation: management highlighted Investor Day commitments achieved early, rather than revising FY2026 guidance figures.
Management repeatedly highlighted lumpy tariff effects and operational offsets, making the phasing important for estimates.
Listen for gross margin “operational vs tariff” splits and any mitigation plan updates in Q1.
Kate’s reset remained central to the consolidated narrative, with management citing phased execution and learnings.
Monitor purchase intent/brand awareness language, handbag blockbusters performance, and full-price selling progress.
Management positioned AI and a data fabric as a competitive moat influencing product development, marketing, and decisions.
Track management discussion of AI patent usage, AI testing/learning outcomes, and any links to planning speed.
Dafinchi