Loading annual review details
The Clorox Company (CLX)FY2026 investor yearly review
Across FY2026, management framed the year as a phased ERP transformation followed by a back-half rebuilding of momentum through innovation and price pack architecture. Results showed a sharper early value-seeking and promotion backdrop, with Q3 mixed performance and Q4 sequential improvement as the company emphasized stabilized service levels, progressing share, and readiness for FY2027.
Overall investor read
Execution improving, but value-conversion still catching up
Management moved from ERP-driven noise to stabilized operations, yet acknowledged some categories improved slower than expected in Q3.
Primary financial signal
Revenue down; margins pressured by cost and mix
FY2026 revenue declined and EPS fell materially; management discussed cost headwinds and delayed savings affecting gross margin.
Primary call signal
Back half narrative strengthened by innovation ramp and share progress
Q2 and Q4 emphasized innovation shelf ramp, share turnarounds, and stabilized fulfillment as key path to FY2027.
Headline outcomes that summarize profitability, earnings power, and balance-sheet position.
Revenue
Full-year revenue down -5.4% amid volatile consumer and execution noise.
Diluted EPS
EPS declined -26.2% as gross margin and earnings faced headwinds.
Gross margin
Gross margin ended at 42.3% after supply chain costs and delays.
Operating margin
Operating margin closed at 24.7%, with cost and mix impacts described.
Net income
Net income fell -27.5% reflecting lower earnings power versus prior year.
R&D expense
R&D declined -4.1%, while management prioritized innovation for share gains.
Net debt
Net debt ended at $5.38B as liquidity and balance-sheet discipline were emphasized.
Phased ERP modernization set the foundation, but innovation conversion and category execution took longer—followed by sequential momentum into Q4 and FY2027.
Digital transformation
Management described Q1 as the ERP launch ramp with temporary challenges and outlook adjustments, then Q2 as sequential improvement while transitioning manufacturing phases. In Q3, ERP completion helped stabilize, but gross margin and progress were slower than expected; by Q4, service levels and operational complexity were framed as winding down.
Quarter-by-quarter materiality and tone for annual transcript themes.
Scroll horizontally to see more columns.
| Theme | Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | Next monitor |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ERP went live, then moved into optimization and value capture | Mixed ERP U.S. launch created fulfillment noise; outlook adjusted for rest of year. |
Management progress accelerated from ERP stabilization into innovation execution, but conversion delays in specific categories and cost-savings timing remained key pressure points.
In Q4, management cited share growth streaks in Home Care and turnarounds in Glad, trash, and Hidden Valley behind innovation, price pack architecture, marketing spend, and activations.
Across Q1–Q4, management moved from launch disruption to completion and stabilization, framing the ERP as enabling end-to-end visibility and faster execution for later momentum.
Q2 and Q4 emphasized a robust innovation slate and ramping shelf resets, with management describing strong execution in cleaning and progress in other launches.
Year unfolded from ERP launch disruption to optimization, innovation ramp, and sequential improvement into Q4; key investor focus shifted from stabilization to category conversion.
Gross margin pressure, then stabilization focus
FY2026 began with ERP-led disruption and competitive value pressure, shifted into innovation-backed recovery in Q2, then faced slower-than-expected category conversion and margin headwinds in Q3—before Q4 restored momentum and sharpened FY2027 priorities.
Management described Q1 as a milestone ERP launch with operational transition challenges and category value-seeking dynamics. They highlighted back-half innovation and market share improvement, while acknowledging out-of-stock impacts and the need to regain lost share.
Read earnings transcriptManagement framed Q2 as sequential improvement, while explaining shipment favorability as ERP manufacturing-phase prebuild noise expected to reverse. They emphasized that innovation shelf resets would ramp through Q3 and early Q4, with defined platforms and demand creation.
Topics management and analysts returned to repeatedly shaped the year’s debate: conversion of innovation and superiority into share and margins, plus when cost and inflation effects would normalize enough for confidence.
Litter was repeatedly described as slower than expected, with conversion and shelf execution still in progress.
Track shelf placement, Fresh Step/price pack architecture adjustments, and velocity consistency in marketing ramp.
Gross margin was pressured by supply chain costs and delayed savings, and future confidence depended on timing of recoveries.
Innovation execution
Across Q1–Q4, management repeatedly tied improving share and category recovery to a robust innovation slate, including new platforms and price pack architecture. Q2 highlighted innovation shelf timing and expected ramp from Q3 into early Q4; Q3 noted Litter and Food were slower; Q4 pointed to sequential improvement and category turnarounds.
Consumer value & pricing
Management described a consumer under stress with increased promotions and competitive activity, especially in trash and cat litter, and framed price pack architecture as a way to meet consumers across sizes and price points. While selective price investments were discussed in Q2 and Q3, Q4 emphasized targeted pricing and continued use of the broader toolbox to protect share while pursuing margin recovery.
Margin quality & cost discipline
Management attributed gross margin pressure to higher-than-expected supply chain costs and delayed cost savings in Q3, linking ERP stabilization to slower progress. In Q4, they emphasized a stronger foundation, optimization of supply chain and admin, and described pipeline and productivity levers to recover margins in later quarters and into FY2027.
Sequential improvement as manufacturing phases advanced; ERP noise framed as easing.
Mixed ERP completion improved stability, but progress slowed and margins missed expectations. |
Positive Complexity framed as winding down; focus shifted to optimization and productivity. |
| Track whether stabilization leads to earlier supply chain optimization and less quarter-to-quarter margin volatility. |
| Back-half innovations became the core lever for share | Positive Management tied back-half demand creation to innovations and category stabilization. | Positive Innovation shelf ramp emphasized; PURE and Fresh Step plans expected to scale. | Mixed Litter and Food lagged expectations; Fresh Step conversion described as still in progress. | Positive Multiple category turnarounds cited; Litter remained the main 'hangover' to fix. | Watch Litter on-shelf conversion (shelf placement, claim communication) and Food promotional intensity trends. |
| Value-seeking kept promotions elevated; management stayed disciplined | Mixed Competitive environment rational but promotions rose; value-seeking shaped price pack plans. | Mixed Trash and cat litter promo intensity elevated; selective price investments discussed. | Mixed Price/mix headwind persisted; management emphasized RGM and promo discipline. | Mixed Promotion viewed as timing noise; FY2027 promo expected elevated by value focus. | Monitor price/mix expectations and whether promo effectiveness improves versus category competition pockets. |
| Cost savings and margin recovery arrived later than planned | Negative Gross margin missed expectations; higher supply chain costs and delayed savings cited. | Mixed Optimization plan outlined; inflation persistence and cost levers framed for recovery. | Track supply chain cost pressure and the timing of structural savings vs temporary items affecting gross margin. |
| Portfolio and growth expansion via GOJO integration | Positive Acquisition of Gojo framed as expanding health and hygiene leadership. | Positive Gojo integration described as on track; accretion and margin profile explained. | Positive Clorox Purell performance described as strong; integration proceeding as planned. | Monitor like-for-like performance and any recurring gross margin dilution or integration-driven volatility. |
| Consumer resilience in essential categories | Positive Management argued categories had a 'floor' via essentials and back-half plans. | Positive Consumer steady and focus on value persisted; category growth expected flat-to-up. | Positive Despite tougher environment, categories described as resilient and private label stabilized. | Mixed Management expected muted categories; sequential improvements and market share turnarounds noted. | Watch category growth band (0% to 1%) and confirm it holds amid macro uncertainty and inflation. |
Management described expanding RGM and price pack architecture to address size and channel shifts, including targeted pricing flexibility and tailored value equations by business and retailer.
In Q3, management said the pace of improvement was slower than anticipated, calling out Litter and Food as categories where expected improvement did not fully materialize.
Q3 results were described as mixed and below expectations, with gross margin impacted by higher-than-expected supply chain costs and delayed cost savings.
Across Q1–Q4, management repeatedly discussed elevated promotions and competitive intensity in trash and cat litter, while emphasizing discipline to avoid value destruction.
For FY2027, management described inflation expected above $200M, more persistent than baseline ranges, with greater impact in the first half and broader supply chain inflation drivers.
Scroll horizontally to see more columns.
| Quarter | Revenue | YoY revenue growth | Diluted EPS | Gross margin | Investor read |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1Sep-25 | $1.43B | -28.1% | $0.65 | 41.7% | Management framed Q1 as ERP launch disruption plus category headwinds; adjusted full-year outlook, expected back-half inflection via innovation and market share improvement. |
| Q2Dec-25 | $1.67B | 17.1% | $1.29 | 43.2% | Sequential improvement showed up, while ERP shipment timing created noise before innovation ramps. |
| Q3Mar-26 | $1.67B | -0.2% | $1.54 | 43.2% | ERP completion improved stability, but category and margin progress lagged expectations. |
| Q4Jun-26 | $1.95B | 16.6% | $1.33 | 41.3% | Management pointed to improving share and better foundations, with inflation and Litter as key watch items. |
Management said Q3 results were mixed and below expectations, with improvement slower in some businesses and gross margin pressured by higher supply chain costs and delayed savings due to stabilizing service levels. They outlined Litter and Food as key areas for continued progress in Q4.
Read earnings transcriptManagement characterized Q4 as capped by sequential improvement in consumption and share exit rate, and emphasized the year-end shift toward operational optimization and targeted superiority actions. They cited multiple category turnarounds while calling Litter the main remaining transformation work.
Read earnings transcriptWatch supply chain cost commentary, cost-saving pipeline progress, and gross margin bridge items by quarter.
Management tied value-seeking behavior to elevated promotions and emphasized avoiding value destruction while protecting share.
Monitor promotion intensity in trash and cat litter, plus management’s RGM/PPA actions and price mix outlooks.
GOJO added revenue exposure and changed the P&L profile; investors wanted to know what portion reflected integration versus organic momentum.
Track like-for-like performance, integration pacing, and any recurring margin dilution or adjusted EPS effects.
Management continued to expect muted category growth (flat to 0–1 range), making execution the key upside/ downside driver.
Monitor management’s category growth range commentary, consumption trend updates, and whether share gains widen organically.
Dafinchi