📊 An insightful exploration of Pure Storage's revenue growth and gross margin stability from 2019 through 2026, highlighting robust subscription expansion and product mix impacts. 🚀
Generated by Dafinchi AI. Source-grounded AI analysis, not investment advice.
What has been the revenue trends and gross margin trends over the years.
| Fiscal Year / Quarter | Revenue (approx.) | Revenue Growth | Total Gross Margin | Product Gross Margin | Subscription Gross Margin | Key Commentary |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 Q2 (Guidance) | $3.6B-$3.63B (FY) | 14% YoY (midpt) | 72.1% (Q2) | 68% (Q2) | 76.5% (Q2) | Product and subscription revenue both growing; subscription margin higher than product; product margin improved 4 pts YoY. |
| 2026 Q1 | Not specified | 12% YoY (Q1) | 70.9% (Q1) | 64% (Q1) | 77.2% (Q1) | Product margin expected to settle in mid-60s for year; subscription >50% of revenue. |
| 2025 Q4 (FY) | $3.2B (FY) | 12% YoY (FY) | 71.8% (FY) | 62.9% (Q4) | 77.2% (Q4) | Product margin impacted by E family sales; subscription margin robust. |
| 2025 Q3 | $831M (Q3) | 9% YoY (Q3) | 71.9% (Q3) | 67.4% (Q3) | 77.4% (Q3) | Product margin declined modestly due to mix shift to cost-sensitive E family. |
| 2025 Q2 | $764M (Q2) | 11% YoY (Q2) | 72.8% (Q2) | 69.5% (Q2) | 76.4% (Q2) | Product margin in high-60s; expected modest decline in 2H due to E family growth. |
| 2025 Q1 | $489M (US Q1) | Not specified | 73.9% (Q1) | 72.8% (Q1) | 74.9% (Q1) | Strong start to year; product margin high due to mix and pricing. |
| 2024 Q4 (FY) | $2.82B (FY) | 2.5% YoY (FY) | 73.2% (FY) | 73.4% (Q4) | 74.1% (Q4) | Subscription revenue and ARR strong; product margin high. |
| 2024 Q3 | $689M (Q2) | 6.5% YoY (Q2) | 74% (Q3) | 73.1% (Q3) | 75.4% (Q3) | Product and subscription margins strong; flash pricing favorable. |
| 2024 Q2 | $495M (US Q2) | Not specified | 72.8% (Q2) | 71.5% (Q2) | 74.5% (Q2) | Product margin strong; subscription revenue 42% of total. |
| 2024 Q1 | $589M (Q1) | ~5% YoY (adj.) | 72.2% (Q1) | 70.8% (Q1) | 73.7% (Q1) | Subscription revenue 48% of total; gross margins stable. |
| 2023 Q4 (FY) | $2.8B (FY) | 26% YoY (FY) | 71% (Q4) | Not specified | 74% (Q4) | Product and subscription margins strong; subscription revenue 1/3 of total. |
| 2023 Q3 | $676M (Q3) | 20% YoY (Q3) | 70.9% (Q3) | 70.1% (Q3) | 72.3% (Q3) | Product margin up YoY; subscription margin stable. |
| 2023 Q2 | $647M (Q2) | 30% YoY (Q2) | 70.4% (Q2) | 69% (Q2) | ~73% (Q2) | Product and subscription margins strong. |
| 2023 Q1 | Not specified | Not specified | 70.6% (Q1) | 70% (Q1) | 71.5% (Q1) | Margins at high end of range. |
| 2022 Q4 (FY) | $2.2B (FY) | 29% YoY (FY) | 69% (Q4) | 67% (Q4) | 73% (Q4) | Product margin slightly impacted by supply chain costs. |
| 2022 Q3 | Not specified | Not specified | 68.5% (Q3) | 66.7% (Q3) | 72.1% (Q3) | Product margin impacted by hyperscaler deal and supply chain costs. |
| 2022 Q2 | Not specified | Not specified | 70.5% (Q2) | 70.2% (Q2) | 71.1% (Q2) | Margins improved sequentially. |
| 2022 Q1 | $413M (Q1) | 12% YoY (Q1) | 70.5% (Q1) | 70.2% (Q1) | 71.1% (Q1) | Margins at high end of range. |
| 2021 Q4 (FY) | Not specified | Not specified | 69.4% (Q4) | 69.1% (Q4) | 70.2% (Q4) | Product margin down YoY due to prior year NAND pricing. |
| 2021 Q3 | $410.6M (Q3) | -4.2% YoY (Q3) | 69.1% (Q3) | Not specified | Not specified | Product margin down YoY; subscription margin up. |
| 2021 Q2 | Not specified | Not specified | 69.8% (Q2) | 70.1% (Q2) | 69.2% (Q2) | Margins stable. |
| 2021 Q1 | Not specified | Not specified | 71.9% (Q1) | 73.3% (Q1) | 68.9% (Q1) | Margins up YoY. |
| 2020 Q4 (FY) | Not specified | Not specified | Not specified | Not specified | Not specified | Not enough data. |
| 2019 Q4 (FY) | Not specified | Not specified | 67.6% (Q4) | 67.8% (Q4) | 66.8% (Q4) | Margins at high end of range. |
| 2019 Q3 | Not specified | Not specified | 68.1% (Q3) | 68.1% (Q3) | 68.1% (Q3) | Margins stable. |
| 2019 Q2 | Not specified | Not specified | Not specified | 67.9% (Q2) | 68.4% (Q2) | Highest gross margin in company history. |
| 2019 Q1 | Not specified | Not specified | 66.3% (Q1) | 66.3% (Q1) | 66.3% (Q1) | Margins stable. |
Disclaimer: The output generated by dafinchi.ai, a Large Language Model (LLM), may contain inaccuracies or "hallucinations." Users should independently verify the accuracy of any mathematical calculations, numerical data, and associated units, as well as the credibility of any sources cited. The developers and providers of dafinchi.ai cannot be held liable for any inaccuracies or decisions made based on the LLM's output.
Pure Storage's FY27 earnings guidance highlights significant acceleration in hyperscaler revenue contribution, particularly in the second half of the fiscal year. Management emphasizes high gross margins and timing aligned with hyperscaler data center buildouts.
Sources used
Research questionCan management quantify expected hyperscaler revenue contribution to FY27 at the midpoint and the assumed timing by quarter?
Answer outline
🚀 Pure Storage's Q2 2026 earnings reveal a 4-point margin improvement powered by smart revenue mix shifts, premium product demand, and pricing discipline. 📈 High-margin deals like Meta add value but core operations lead the growth!
Sources used
Research questionMargin improvement
Answer outline
📈 Pure Storage’s sales have evolved significantly from 2019 to 2026, driven by soaring AI and data center demand, with a major shift towards subscription revenue and innovative product lines. 🚀
Sources used
Research questionSummarize how Pure Storage’s sales trends have evolved over the past five years, focusing on the impact of AI-driven demand and data center growth on its revenue mix. Highlight evidence of increasing product sales linked to AI workloads, changes in pricing or volume, and management’s commentary on the future financial outlook and growth strategy.
Answer outline
🚀 Discover how Pure Storage is poised to revolutionize datacenter efficiency through strategic investments and innovative technologies in Q3 2025! 🌟
Sources used
Research questionInvestments in datacenter
Answer outline
📊 Discover how Pure Storage has evolved its strategy and margin improvement approach from 2019 to 2026 through innovation, operational efficiency, and market expansion! 🚀
Sources used
Research questionAnalyze all historical earnings transcripts and write a clear, engaging narrative explaining the company’s strategy, evolution, and market role. Describe what the company does, the products and services it offers, and the customer segments it serves. Pay special attention to margin improvement: summarize everything management has discussed about efficiency programs, cost discipline, pricing strategy, product-mix shifts, automation, supply-chain changes, restructuring, and any long-term margin frameworks or philosophies. Highlight recurring themes and note how the company’s approach to margins has changed over time. Exclude financial figures; instead focus on the strategic story—why leadership believes these actions improve margins and how they relate to the company’s broader competitive positioning. The final output should read like a concise but insightful analyst narrative.
Answer outline
🌟 Discover how Pure Storage is transforming the datacenter landscape with innovative technologies and strategic partnerships! 🚀
Sources used
Research questionInvestments in datacenter
Answer outline
🔍 Discover how Pure Storage is redefining pricing strategies for cybersecurity products amid evolving market dynamics! 💡
Sources used
Research questionHow are companies defining pricing strategies for cybersecurity products and services, particularly in relation to subscription models, value-based pricing, and industry-specific needs?
Answer outline
Cintas raised its FY2027 incremental-margin outlook to 32%–34% and expects results in the range’s upper half, while cautioning that quarterly progress will be uneven. Workday comparisons, a demanding Q4 comparison, energy assumptions, and cost controls are key factors shaping the outlook; guidance also excludes UniFirst-related transaction costs and assumes no further acquisitions.
Sources used
Research questionWhat is the expected cadence of margins for the rest of the year, and are there notable quarterly comparisons or other factors that could affect it?
Answer outline
AutoZone outlines a store-maturation-driven ROIC story, highlighting zero ROIC in the first year and a path to above 20% by year six, with ~15% by year four. The majority of near-term ROIC gains come from UDS customers through faster delivery and expanded inventory, while national accounts offer longer-term upside but without separate ROIC targets disclosed.
Sources used
Research questionWhat did management say about ROIC by commercial segments?
Answer outline
Management attributes the near-term gross-margin pressure to a rapid ramp in custom products, noting that mix is the primary driver of the Q3 margin decline and that the forecast assumes continued custom growth. They expect the broader Data Center mix—anchored by connectivity and other segments—to stabilize margins in Q4, with margins remaining in the existing range into fiscal 2028 despite ongoing custom expansion.
Sources used
Research questionWhat did management say about Data center margin drivers from custom mix?
Answer outline
Walmart explains that price investments are likely to lift traffic in 2H with lagged effects, while ticket dynamics face deflation and regulatory headwinds; OpEx growth of about 7% is mainly driven by depreciation from CapEx and higher self-insurance costs, with timing shifts supporting the back half.
Sources used
Research questionFor price investments, how will they shape comp assumptions from traffic versus ticket in the second half, and what drove the U.S. OpEx growth of about 7%—timing shifts, liability claims, or other factors?
Answer outline
Marmaxx faced execution-related underperformance due to merchandise-mix gaps in stores, particularly for impulse and basic categories, not due to competition. TJX reports cross-functional fixes and systematic planning to prevent recurrence, with early improvements in August and a targeted return to a 2%-3% comp cadence by Q4 as the holiday season nears.
Sources used
Research questionLorraine Hutchinson asks what went wrong at Marmaxx, what steps have been taken to fix it, and when Marmaxx is expected to return to a 2%-3% comp cadence?
Answer outline